In the political forum on Inara BBS, I jumped in and gave my thoughts on how the primary races were shaping up, and implications for the 2008 elections. Here’s a mostly-verbatim copy of what I saw.
Bias filter: I think the current Republican administration is horrible, as are those who support their policies, and don’t think they have a very strong shot at retaining the White House in ‘08.
So here’s the breakdown:
* **Rudy Giuliani** – He’d better keep beating the 9/11 drum, because it’s about all he’s got. He gets some plus points for a successful run as NYC mayor, but his pro-life history will cost him some points among the Jesus set, and his affairs, remarriages, and shitty treatment of his wives/kids will cost him among the middle-aged Republican Mom set. Dogged by scandal with the Bernard Kerick incident as well. Essentially a one-trick pony at this point.
* **Fred Thompson** – Gets a huge boost initially because he’s not one of the current douchebags running, but beyond that, I don’t think he has a ton of staying power. Has the negatives of being a slimy former lobbyist, and not offering much in terms of policy direction. If someone can hammer him on his mole role in the Nixon hearings, that will also hurt him. Isn’t the second Reagan that he’s pimping himself out to be, and doesn’t show a lot of fire for a long race at this point.
* **John McCain** – How the mighty have fallen. A classic case of how you can’t serve two masters. The right wing has never really liked him because of his history of independence, and his fans in the center/left all abandoned him after he started sucking Bush’s cock. Now a man without a country, I don’t anticipate him making it past the second primary. I could see him as a potential VP, though, if the winner wanted to “show how independent they are.”
* **Mitt Romney** – Has the same problem as Rudy: A centrist social policy past while now trying to suck up to the Jesus freaks. Could be targeted for shifting political whims. Him vs. Obama could present a problem for Republican voters – do they vote for the black man or the Mormon? He’s probably the cleanest Republican out there in terms of skeletons, though, and generally comes across reasonably well.
* **Ron Paul** – In spite of internet hype, has no chance. Too far outside of the establishment to make it through the “Preaching to the choir” primary system, though he’d probably fare better in the general election, especially against an Establishment Democrat. Could be an interesting VP pick for a candidate who wants to show that they’re “outside the system,” though I have my doubts about whether or not he’d play well with others. Also, in spite of the Libertarian hype, has some decidedly non-Libertarian stances (religion, abortion rights).
* **Mike Huckabee** – Got a surprise 2nd place finish in the Iowa straw poll. Probably the most Jesusy candidate out there, which will help him in the primaries. I think that the influence of the Christian Right nationally is on the wane, though. I could see him as a VP to bring in the Jesus vote, though, if he continues to do well.
* **Brownback, Hunter, Tancredo** – interchangable parts trying to burrow into the Christians like a tick. Nearly zero chance.
As to who will emrge, my guess is either Romney or Thompson. Thompson probably plays better in the primaries, but I think Romney is the stronger candidate against a given Democrat, though. Both would have an uphill road against any sane Democrat, though, especially with the housing market downturn and Iraq playing against the incumbents.
**Best Slate From Above**: Romney/McCain
**Most Likely Slate From Above**: Thompson/Huckabee
We’ll check back later in the year to see how things are going.